>>> On 19.01.16 at 13:31, wrote:
> On 18/12/15 16:58, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 18.12.15 at 15:09, wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/common/spinlock.c
>>> +++ b/xen/common/spinlock.c
>>> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ static atomic_t spin_debug __read_mostly = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
>>>
>>> static void check_lock(struct l
On 18/12/15 16:58, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.12.15 at 15:09, wrote:
--- a/xen/common/spinlock.c
+++ b/xen/common/spinlock.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ static atomic_t spin_debug __read_mostly = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
static void check_lock(struct lock_debug *debug)
{
-int irq_safe = !local_irq_is_e
>>> On 18.12.15 at 15:09, wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/spinlock.c
> +++ b/xen/common/spinlock.c
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ static atomic_t spin_debug __read_mostly = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
>
> static void check_lock(struct lock_debug *debug)
> {
> -int irq_safe = !local_irq_is_enabled();
> +s16 irq_sa
From: Jennifer Herbert
Reduce the size of struct lock_debug so increases in other lock
structures don't increase the size of struct domain too much.
Signed-off-by: Jennifer Herbert
Signed-off-by: David Vrabel
---
xen/common/spinlock.c | 2 +-
xen/include/xen/spinlock.h | 2 +-
2 files ch
