>>> On 23.06.15 at 11:34, wrote:
> On 23/06/15 10:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 22.06.15 at 18:21, wrote:
>>> Since the NMI handler can now recognize watchdog NMIs, make
>>> check_nmi_watchdog() only check for at least one watchdog NMI. This
>>> prevents false negatives caused by other process
On 23/06/15 10:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.06.15 at 18:21, wrote:
>> Since the NMI handler can now recognize watchdog NMIs, make
>> check_nmi_watchdog() only check for at least one watchdog NMI. This
>> prevents false negatives caused by other processors (which may be
>> being power managed
>>> On 22.06.15 at 18:21, wrote:
> Since the NMI handler can now recognize watchdog NMIs, make
> check_nmi_watchdog() only check for at least one watchdog NMI. This
> prevents false negatives caused by other processors (which may be
> being power managed by the BIOS) running at reduced clock freq
Since the NMI handler can now recognize watchdog NMIs, make
check_nmi_watchdog() only check for at least one watchdog NMI. This
prevents false negatives caused by other processors (which may be
being power managed by the BIOS) running at reduced clock frequencies.
This will also slightly speed up
