On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 01:17:01PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 11:14:27AM -0600, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> > Currently mem-sharing can be performed on a page-by-page basis from the
> > control
> > domain. However, this process is quite wasteful when a range of pages have
> > to
On Aug 2, 2016 06:17, "Wei Liu" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 11:14:27AM -0600, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> > Currently mem-sharing can be performed on a page-by-page basis from the
control
> > domain. However, this process is quite wasteful when a range of pages
have to
> > be deduplicated.
> >
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 11:14:27AM -0600, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> Currently mem-sharing can be performed on a page-by-page basis from the
> control
> domain. However, this process is quite wasteful when a range of pages have to
> be deduplicated.
>
> This patch introduces a new mem_sharing memop
Currently mem-sharing can be performed on a page-by-page basis from the control
domain. However, this process is quite wasteful when a range of pages have to
be deduplicated.
This patch introduces a new mem_sharing memop for range sharing where
the user doesn't have to separately nominate each pag
