On March 24, 2016 7:11pm, wrote:
> On March 24, 2016 6:33pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 24.03.16 at 06:57, wrote:
> > without the other one even known to be almost ready to go in. I think
> > loose dependencies are okay, but in the case here everything would
> > better be presented together
On March 24, 2016 6:33pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 24.03.16 at 06:57, wrote:
> > **NOTE**
> >This patch set should base on 2 prereq patch sets:
> > a). Make the pcidevs_lock a recursive one.
>
> This one already went in, so is pointless to mention here.
Agreed,
>
> > b). Check
>>> On 24.03.16 at 06:57, wrote:
> **NOTE**
>This patch set should base on 2 prereq patch sets:
> a). Make the pcidevs_lock a recursive one.
This one already went in, so is pointless to mention here.
> b). Check VT-d Device-TLB flush error.
And this one is WIP, so it's continuing to
This patches fix current timeout concern and also allow limited ATS support:
1. Reduce spin timeout to 1ms, which can be boot-time changed with
'vtd_qi_timeout'.
For example:
multiboot /boot/xen.gz ... vtd_qi_timeout=100 ...
2. Wrap a _sync version for all VT-d flush interfaces.
