On 08/05/2015 07:19 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 06:24:37PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> [...]
>>>
>>
>> Right. I misinterpreted sd_boot.
>>
>> You patch, however, has the undesirable effect that it fails to report
>> error if xenstored is started by systemd but couldn't claim the
>> soc
On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 11:56 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 11:48:15AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 11:17 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't think so. Though the doc is not clear on how we should use
> > > those
> > > APIs, I got my idea from
> > >
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 11:48:15AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 11:17 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> >
> > I don't think so. Though the doc is not clear on how we should use those
> > APIs, I got my idea from
> >
> > http://0pointer.de/public/cups-patch-core.txt
> >
> > which doe
On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 11:17 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
>
> I don't think so. Though the doc is not clear on how we should use those
> APIs, I got my idea from
>
> http://0pointer.de/public/cups-patch-core.txt
>
> which doesn't call sd_booted.
OK, FM then: Acked-by: Ian Campbell
As a future cleanu
Sorry I missed some inline comments.
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 10:13:16AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > ---8<---
> > From a03eba6e258d8097b974366abb50b39af9e9abbf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Wei Liu
> > Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 19:02:34 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] cxenstored: fix systemd socket
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 10:29:59AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 10:20 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 10:13:16AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 19:19 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 06:24:37PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote
On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 10:20 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 10:13:16AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 19:19 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 06:24:37PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Right. I misinterpreted sd_b
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 10:13:16AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 19:19 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 06:24:37PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > [...]
> > > >
> > >
> > > Right. I misinterpreted sd_boot.
> > >
> > > You patch, however, has the undesirable effect
On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 19:19 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 06:24:37PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> [...]
> > >
> >
> > Right. I misinterpreted sd_boot.
> >
> > You patch, however, has the undesirable effect that it fails to report
> > error if xenstored is started by systemd but coul
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 06:24:37PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
[...]
> >
>
> Right. I misinterpreted sd_boot.
>
> You patch, however, has the undesirable effect that it fails to report
> error if xenstored is started by systemd but couldn't claim the
> socket. I don't think this is the correct behavio
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 05:30:34PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 11:56:44AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Ian Campbell
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 11:06 +0100, George Dunla
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 11:56:44AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Ian Campbell
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 11:06 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
>> >>
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 11:56:44AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 11:06 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> >> wrote:
> >> > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
> >> >
> >> > Th
On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 12:21 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Ian Campbell
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 11:56 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Ian Campbell <
> > > ian.campb...@citrix.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2015-08-05
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 11:56 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Ian Campbell
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 11:06 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
>> > >
On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 12:11 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> I'm a bit surprised that chkconfig doesn't just to the right thing. It's
> possible that the fact that our initscript and our systemd unitfiles do not
> share the same names has defeated its heuristics.
Perhaps as well as fixing xenstored
On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 11:56 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Ian Campbell
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 11:06 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> > > wrote:
> > > > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
> > > >
> > > >
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 11:06 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
>> wrote:
>> > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
>> >
>> > This adds systemd socket activation support for the C xenstored.
>> > Active so
On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 11:06 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> wrote:
> > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
> >
> > This adds systemd socket activation support for the C xenstored.
> > Active sockets enable xenstored to be loaded only if required by a
>
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
wrote:
> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
>
> This adds systemd socket activation support for the C xenstored.
> Active sockets enable xenstored to be loaded only if required by a system
> onto which Xen is installed on. Socket activation is handled by
20 matches
Mail list logo
