On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:28:14PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> On 02/04/2016 03:40 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 01:27:28PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> In COLO mode, both VMs are running, and are considered in sync if the
> >> visible network traffic is identical. After some
On 02/04/2016 03:40 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 01:27:28PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> In COLO mode, both VMs are running, and are considered in sync if the
>> visible network traffic is identical. After some time, they fall out of
>> sync.
>>
>> At this point, the two VMs have
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 01:27:28PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> In COLO mode, both VMs are running, and are considered in sync if the
> visible network traffic is identical. After some time, they fall out of
> sync.
>
> At this point, the two VMs have definitely diverged. Lets call the
> primary
On 01/30/2016 12:38 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 01:27:28PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> In COLO mode, both VMs are running, and are considered in sync if the
>> visible network traffic is identical. After some time, they fall out of
>> sync.
>>
>> At this point, the
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 01:27:28PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> In COLO mode, both VMs are running, and are considered in sync if the
> visible network traffic is identical. After some time, they fall out of
> sync.
>
> At this point, the two VMs have definitely diverged. Lets call the
> primary
In COLO mode, both VMs are running, and are considered in sync if the
visible network traffic is identical. After some time, they fall out of
sync.
At this point, the two VMs have definitely diverged. Lets call the
primary dirty bitmap set A, while the secondary dirty bitmap set B.
Sets A and B
