On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 30.03.17 at 00:18, wrote:
> > @@ -104,16 +105,22 @@ headers.chk: $(PUBLIC_ANSI_HEADERS) Makefile
> > done >$@.new
> > mv $@.new $@
> >
> > +headers99.chk: $(PUBLIC_C99_HEADERS) Makefile
> > + rm -f $@.new $@
>
> Why also $@?
>
> > +
>>> On 30.03.17 at 00:18, wrote:
> @@ -104,16 +105,22 @@ headers.chk: $(PUBLIC_ANSI_HEADERS) Makefile
> done >$@.new
> mv $@.new $@
>
> +headers99.chk: $(PUBLIC_C99_HEADERS) Makefile
> + rm -f $@.new $@
Why also $@?
> + $(foreach i, $(filter %.h,$^), $(CC) -x c -std=c99 -Wa
Introduce a C99 headers check, for non-ANSI compliant headers: 9pfs.h
and pvcalls.h.
In addition to the usual -include stdint.h, also add -include string.h
to the C99 check to get the declaration of memcpy and size_t.
For the same reason, also add -include cstring to the C++ check when
necessary.
