> > @@ -772,15 +772,16 @@ int arch_setup_meminit(struct xc_dom_image *dom)
> > return rc;
> > }
> >
> > -dom->p2m_host = xc_dom_malloc(dom, sizeof(xen_pfn_t) *
> > dom->total_pages);
> > -if ( dom->p2m_host == NULL )
> > -return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > if ( dom-
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 04:18:08PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 15:33 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 03:26:58PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 15:55 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > > Currently all in tree code doesn't set the superpage fl
On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 15:33 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 03:26:58PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 15:55 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > Currently all in tree code doesn't set the superpage flag, but Konrad
> > > wants it retained for the moment.
> >
> > ... be
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 03:26:58PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 15:55 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Currently all in tree code doesn't set the superpage flag, but Konrad
> > wants it retained for the moment.
>
> ... because? I can't seem to see any relevant mails from Konrad in m
On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 15:55 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> Currently all in tree code doesn't set the superpage flag, but Konrad
> wants it retained for the moment.
... because? I can't seem to see any relevant mails from Konrad in my
vnuma patch folder.
In any case, the why is far more important than t
Currently all in tree code doesn't set the superpage flag, but Konrad
wants it retained for the moment.
As I'm going to change the p2m_host array allocation, duplicate the code
snippet to allocate p2m_host array in this patch, so that we retain the
behaviour in superpage case.
This patch introduc
