On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 08:16:40AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 06.05.15 at 09:05, wrote:
> > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 11:43:57AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 05.05.15 at 12:25, wrote:
> >> > My concern is the original APIC IDs do not need to be consecutive. Then
> >> > in such case
>>> On 06.05.15 at 09:05, wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 11:43:57AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 05.05.15 at 12:25, wrote:
>> > My concern is the original APIC IDs do not need to be consecutive. Then
>> > in such case even we do
>> >
>> > DIV_ROUND_UP(cpu_num_from_madt, boot_cpu_data.x8
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 11:43:57AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 05.05.15 at 12:25, wrote:
> > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 10:11:15AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 05.05.15 at 09:44, wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 03:46:11PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> >>> On 23.04.15 at 11:
>>> On 05.05.15 at 12:25, wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 10:11:15AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 05.05.15 at 09:44, wrote:
>> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 03:46:11PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> >>> On 23.04.15 at 11:55, wrote:
>> >> > @@ -717,6 +722,14 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(u
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 10:11:15AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 05.05.15 at 09:44, wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 03:46:11PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 23.04.15 at 11:55, wrote:
> >> > @@ -717,6 +722,14 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
> >> >
> >> >
>>> On 05.05.15 at 09:44, wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 03:46:11PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 23.04.15 at 11:55, wrote:
>> > @@ -717,6 +722,14 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>> >
>> > stack_base[0] = stack_start;
>> >
>> > +nr_sockets = DIV_ROUND_U
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 03:46:11PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 23.04.15 at 11:55, wrote:
> > @@ -301,6 +304,8 @@ static void set_cpu_sibling_map(int cpu)
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > +
> > +cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &socket_to_cpumask[cpu_to_socket(cpu)]);
> > }
>
> The
>>> On 23.04.15 at 11:55, wrote:
> @@ -301,6 +304,8 @@ static void set_cpu_sibling_map(int cpu)
> }
> }
> }
> +
> +cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &socket_to_cpumask[cpu_to_socket(cpu)]);
> }
There is an early return path in this function, which you need to
deal with.
> @@ -
Maintain socket_to_cpumask which contains all the HT and core siblings
in the same socket.
Signed-off-by: Chao Peng
---
xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c| 15 +++
xen/include/asm-x86/smp.h | 8
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c b/xen/arch/x86/s
