> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2017 2:44 AM
>
> On 19/01/17 17:29, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > There's nothing wrong with allowing the domain to perform DMA transfers to
> > MMIO areas that it already can access from the CPU, and this allows u
On 19/01/17 17:29, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> There's nothing wrong with allowing the domain to perform DMA transfers to
> MMIO areas that it already can access from the CPU, and this allows us to
> remove the hack in set_identity_p2m_entry for PVH Dom0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné
Subject t
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 06:41:06AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Roger Pau Monne [mailto:roger@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 1:30 AM
> >
> > There's nothing wrong with allowing the domain to perform DMA transfers to
> > MMIO areas that it already can access from the CPU,
> From: Roger Pau Monne [mailto:roger@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 1:30 AM
>
> There's nothing wrong with allowing the domain to perform DMA transfers to
> MMIO areas that it already can access from the CPU, and this allows us to
> remove the hack in set_identity_p2m_entry for
There's nothing wrong with allowing the domain to perform DMA transfers to
MMIO areas that it already can access from the CPU, and this allows us to
remove the hack in set_identity_p2m_entry for PVH Dom0.
Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné
---
Cc: Jun Nakajima
Cc: Kevin Tian
Cc: George Dunlap
Cc:
