On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 12:58:14AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 01.09.16 at 23:19, wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 01:46:24AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 31.08.16 at 22:50, wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:46:31AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> >>> On 31.08.16 at 16:
>>> On 01.09.16 at 23:19, wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 01:46:24AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 31.08.16 at 22:50, wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:46:31AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> >>> On 31.08.16 at 16:59, wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 08:41:39AM -0600, Jan Beuli
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 01:46:24AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 31.08.16 at 22:50, wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:46:31AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 31.08.16 at 16:59, wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 08:41:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> >>> On 20.08.16 at 00:
>>> On 31.08.16 at 22:50, wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:46:31AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 31.08.16 at 16:59, wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 08:41:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> >>> On 20.08.16 at 00:43, wrote:
>> >> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S
>> >> > +++ b/xen/ar
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:46:31AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 31.08.16 at 16:59, wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 08:41:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 20.08.16 at 00:43, wrote:
[...]
> >> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S
> >> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S
> >> > @@ -12,
>>> On 31.08.16 at 16:59, wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 08:41:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 20.08.16 at 00:43, wrote:
>> > Every multiboot protocol (regardless of version) compatible image must
>> > specify its load address (in ELF or multiboot header). Multiboot protocol
>> > compa
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 08:41:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 20.08.16 at 00:43, wrote:
> > Every multiboot protocol (regardless of version) compatible image must
> > specify its load address (in ELF or multiboot header). Multiboot protocol
> > compatible loader have to load image at speci
>>> On 20.08.16 at 00:43, wrote:
> Every multiboot protocol (regardless of version) compatible image must
> specify its load address (in ELF or multiboot header). Multiboot protocol
> compatible loader have to load image at specified address. However, there
> is no guarantee that the requested mem
Every multiboot protocol (regardless of version) compatible image must
specify its load address (in ELF or multiboot header). Multiboot protocol
compatible loader have to load image at specified address. However, there
is no guarantee that the requested memory region (in case of Xen it starts
at 1