nt
> > > Cc: Stefano Stabellini; xen-de...@lists.xensource.com; Wei Liu; Ian
> > > Jackson;
> > > Ian Campbell
> > > Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 1/6] libxl: do not add a vkb backend to
> > > hvm guests
> > >
> > > On Fri, 24
.@eu.citrix.com]
> > > > Sent: 24 July 2015 11:56
> > > > To: Paul Durrant
> > > > Cc: Stefano Stabellini; xen-de...@lists.xensource.com; Wei Liu; Ian
> Jackson;
> > > > Ian Campbell
> > > > Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PA
Ian Jackson;
> > Ian Campbell
> > Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 1/6] libxl: do not add a vkb backend to
> > hvm guests
> >
> > On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Stefano Stabellini [mailto
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 12:29 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> > There really ought to be a way at the libxl level (but not
> > necessarily
> > in xl) to disable the depriv without having to arrange things "just
> > so"
> > such that it doesn't occur...
>
> I have already introduced a device_
gt; > > ]
> > > > Sent: 24 July 2015 11:21
> > > > To: Paul Durrant
> > > > Cc: Stefano Stabellini; xen-de...@lists.xensource.com; Wei Liu;
> > > > Ian Jackson;
> > > > Ian Campbell
> > > > Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PA
t
> > > Cc: Stefano Stabellini; xen-de...@lists.xensource.com; Wei Liu; Ian
> Jackson;
> > > Ian Campbell
> > > Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 1/6] libxl: do not add a vkb backend to
> > > hvm guests
> > >
> > > On Fri, 24 Jul 2015,
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 1/6] libxl: do not add a vkb
backend to hvm guests"):
> There really ought to be a way at the libxl level (but not necessarily
> in xl) to disable the depriv without having to arrange things "just so"
> such that it d
gt; > > To: Paul Durrant
> > > Cc: Stefano Stabellini; xen-de...@lists.xensource.com; Wei Liu;
> > > Ian Jackson;
> > > Ian Campbell
> > > Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 1/6] libxl: do not add a vkb
> > > backend to
> > > hvm guests
> >
Ian Jackson;
> > Ian Campbell
> > Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 1/6] libxl: do not add a vkb backend to
> > hvm guests
> >
> > On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.o
: Wei Liu; Ian Jackson; Ian Campbell; Stefano Stabellini
Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 1/6] libxl: do not add a vkb backend to hvm
guests
When QEMU restricts its xenstore connection, it cannot provide PV
backends. A separate QEMU instance is required to provide PV backends in
userspace, such as
tabellini
> > > Sent: 23 July 2015 18:28
> > > To: xen-de...@lists.xensource.com
> > > Cc: Wei Liu; Ian Jackson; Ian Campbell; Stefano Stabellini
> > > Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 1/6] libxl: do not add a vkb backend to
> hvm
> > > guests
> > >
> > >
; > Cc: Wei Liu; Ian Jackson; Ian Campbell; Stefano Stabellini
> > Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 1/6] libxl: do not add a vkb backend to hvm
> > guests
> >
> > When QEMU restricts its xenstore connection, it cannot provide PV
> > backends. A separate QEMU instance is req
t: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 1/6] libxl: do not add a vkb backend to hvm
> guests
>
> When QEMU restricts its xenstore connection, it cannot provide PV
> backends. A separate QEMU instance is required to provide PV backends in
> userspace, such as qdisk. With two separate instances, it
When QEMU restricts its xenstore connection, it cannot provide PV
backends. A separate QEMU instance is required to provide PV backends in
userspace, such as qdisk. With two separate instances, it is not
possible to take advantage of vkb for mouse and keyboard, as the QEMU
that emulates the graphic
14 matches
Mail list logo
