Many thanks for the changes! The changes look good to me and pass the test.
On 17-10-11 06:06:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 11.10.17 at 09:20, wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
> > @@ -,25 +,43 @@ static unsigned int get_socket_cpu(unsigned int
> > socket
>>> On 11.10.17 at 09:20, wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
> @@ -,25 +,43 @@ static unsigned int get_socket_cpu(unsigned int
> socket)
> struct cos_write_info
> {
> unsigned int cos;
> -struct feat_node *feature;
> const uint32_t *val;
> -co
The whole value array is transferred into 'do_write_psr_msrs'. Then, we can
write all features values on the cos id into MSRs.
Because multiple features may co-exist, we need handle all features to write
values of them into a COS register with new COS ID. E.g:
1. L3 CAT and L2 CAT co-exist.
2. Dom
