Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 00/14] x86: remove paravirt_enabled

2016-04-08 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 03:14:43AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 05:06:20PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > Now that Andy's ASM paravirt_enabled() use is merged > > Sorry I should have provided more context, I meant that now > that Andy's ASM paravirt_enabled() rem

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 00/14] x86: remove paravirt_enabled

2016-04-07 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 05:06:20PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Now that Andy's ASM paravirt_enabled() use is merged Sorry I should have provided more context, I meant that now that Andy's ASM paravirt_enabled() removal is merged: This is the ASM hack that Andy removed: https://git.kernel.o

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 00/14] x86: remove paravirt_enabled

2016-04-07 Thread Juergen Gross
On 07/04/16 02:06, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Now that Andy's ASM paravirt_enabled() use is merged all we need is to address > the rest of the C code uses. This completes that work by providing proper > semantics for platform legacy settings and quirks as suggested by Ingo, this > in > turn can al

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 00/14] x86: remove paravirt_enabled

2016-04-06 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
Now that Andy's ASM paravirt_enabled() use is merged all we need is to address the rest of the C code uses. This completes that work by providing proper semantics for platform legacy settings and quirks as suggested by Ingo, this in turn can also be extended later for benefit of further processing