On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 05:11:05PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] add hypercall
> option to temporarily pin a vcpu"):
> > Applied.
>
> Damn, I see I am too late with my review.
>
> I will propose to re
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] add hypercall
option to temporarily pin a vcpu"):
> Applied.
Damn, I see I am too late with my review.
I will propose to revert some of this. :-/.
Ian.
___
Xen-devel mai
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 12:28:01PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 24/03/16 20:41, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 06:58:44PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >> On 24/03/16 15:03, Wei Liu wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 08:36:21AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Committers,
>
On 24/03/16 20:41, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 06:58:44PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 24/03/16 15:03, Wei Liu wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 08:36:21AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
Committers,
anything missing on my side to have this series being committed?
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 06:58:44PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 24/03/16 15:03, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 08:36:21AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >> Committers,
> >>
> >> anything missing on my side to have this series being committed?
> >> All patches have Acked-by and Review
On 24/03/16 15:03, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 08:36:21AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Committers,
>>
>> anything missing on my side to have this series being committed?
>> All patches have Acked-by and Reviewed-by tags.
>>
>
> Can you provide a branch with all the tags folded in?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 08:36:21AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Committers,
>
> anything missing on my side to have this series being committed?
> All patches have Acked-by and Reviewed-by tags.
>
Can you provide a branch with all the tags folded in?
Wei.
_
Committers,
anything missing on my side to have this series being committed?
All patches have Acked-by and Reviewed-by tags.
Juergen
On 10/03/16 06:27, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Some hardware (e.g. Dell studio 1555 laptops) require SMIs to be
> called on physical cpu 0 only. Linux drivers like dcd
Some hardware (e.g. Dell studio 1555 laptops) require SMIs to be
called on physical cpu 0 only. Linux drivers like dcdbas or i8k try
to achieve this by pinning the running thread to cpu 0, but in Dom0
this is not enough: the vcpu must be pinned to physical cpu 0 via
Xen, too.
This patch series enh
