On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 12:06 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On 06/05/15 10:39, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 19:17 +1000, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> >>> Right, it seems like we may eventually need to introduce the possibility
> >>> of not sharing the p2m depending on the c
Hi Ian,
On 06/05/15 10:39, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 19:17 +1000, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
>>> Right, it seems like we may eventually need to introduce the possibility
>>> of not sharing the p2m depending on the circumstances as is done on x86.
I'd like to avoid non-share P2M as
On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 19:17 +1000, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> > Right, it seems like we may eventually need to introduce the possibility
> > of not sharing the p2m depending on the circumstances as is done on x86.
>
> Yes. How would that work in practice? I guess some of the guests memory space
>
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 09:54:57AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 13:26 +1000, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 02:17:47PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:40 +1000, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> > > > From: "Edgar E. Iglesias"
> > > >
On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 13:26 +1000, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 02:17:47PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:40 +1000, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> > > From: "Edgar E. Iglesias"
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This is a fix for the issue I'm seeing on ZynqMP
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 02:17:47PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:40 +1000, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> > From: "Edgar E. Iglesias"
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a fix for the issue I'm seeing on ZynqMP with missmatched
> > setup of the SMMU and the shared p2m page-tables wit
Hi Ian,
On 05/05/15 14:17, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:40 +1000, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
>> From: "Edgar E. Iglesias"
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a fix for the issue I'm seeing on ZynqMP with missmatched
>> setup of the SMMU and the shared p2m page-tables with the CPU.
>
> Lookin
On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:40 +1000, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> From: "Edgar E. Iglesias"
>
> Hi,
>
> This is a fix for the issue I'm seeing on ZynqMP with missmatched
> setup of the SMMU and the shared p2m page-tables with the CPU.
Looking back at previous conversations it seems like your SMMU h
From: "Edgar E. Iglesias"
Hi,
This is a fix for the issue I'm seeing on ZynqMP with missmatched
setup of the SMMU and the shared p2m page-tables with the CPU.
This implementes a global p2m_ipa_bits cap for S2 input-size as
discussed in the previous RFC.
Best regards,
Edgar
Changelog:
v3 -> v4