On 22/01/15 09:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.01.15 at 21:08, wrote:
>> On 19/01/15 15:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Following the earlier similar change validating CR4 modifications.
>>>
>>> Note that this requires a non-obvious adjustment to hvm_cpuid(): On
>>> 32-bit hosts/tool stacks, the SYSC
>>> On 21.01.15 at 21:08, wrote:
> On 19/01/15 15:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Following the earlier similar change validating CR4 modifications.
>>
>> Note that this requires a non-obvious adjustment to hvm_cpuid(): On
>> 32-bit hosts/tool stacks, the SYSCALL feature flag will be seen clear
>> on In
On 19/01/15 15:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Following the earlier similar change validating CR4 modifications.
>
> Note that this requires a non-obvious adjustment to hvm_cpuid(): On
> 32-bit hosts/tool stacks, the SYSCALL feature flag will be seen clear
> on Intel CPUs, yet 64-bit guests legitimately
Following the earlier similar change validating CR4 modifications.
Note that this requires a non-obvious adjustment to hvm_cpuid(): On
32-bit hosts/tool stacks, the SYSCALL feature flag will be seen clear
on Intel CPUs, yet 64-bit guests legitimately expect the feature for
be available. Mimic hard
