> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 5:44 PM
>
> >>> On 13.06.17 at 10:29, wrote:
> On 13.06.17 at 10:20, wrote:
> >> From the context calling pi_desc_init(), we can conclude the current
> >> implementation of VT-d PI depends on CPU-side PI. If we
>>> On 13.06.17 at 10:29, wrote:
On 13.06.17 at 10:20, wrote:
>> From the context calling pi_desc_init(), we can conclude the current
>> implementation of VT-d PI depends on CPU-side PI. If we enable VT-d PI
>> and disable CPU-side PI by disabling APICv explicitly in xen boot
>> command line
>>> On 13.06.17 at 10:20, wrote:
> From the context calling pi_desc_init(), we can conclude the current
> implementation of VT-d PI depends on CPU-side PI. If we enable VT-d PI
> and disable CPU-side PI by disabling APICv explicitly in xen boot
> command line, we would get an assertion failure.
>
From the context calling pi_desc_init(), we can conclude the current
implementation of VT-d PI depends on CPU-side PI. If we enable VT-d PI
and disable CPU-side PI by disabling APICv explicitly in xen boot
command line, we would get an assertion failure.
This patch clears iommu_intpost once findin
