Hi Ian,
On 18/05/17 19:11, Ian Jackson wrote:
Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH v3 for-4.9 0/3] libxl/devd: bugfixes"):
On 17/05/17 15:02, Julien Grall wrote:
For the last patch, at this stage of the release I would prefer to defer
it for Xen 4.10.
After reviewing these, I'd like to make a ca
Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH v3 for-4.9 0/3] libxl/devd: bugfixes"):
> On 17/05/17 15:02, Julien Grall wrote:
> > For the last patch, at this stage of the release I would prefer to defer
> > it for Xen 4.10.
After reviewing these, I'd like to make a case for the third patch for
4.9:
I haven't
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 04:06:33PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> (CC Ian and Wei)
>
I did see this. Ian said he wanted to review this in detail. That's why
I haven't committed them.
> On 17/05/17 15:02, Julien Grall wrote:
> > On 16/05/17 08:59, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > > Hello,
> >
> > Hi Rog
(CC Ian and Wei)
On 17/05/17 15:02, Julien Grall wrote:
On 16/05/17 08:59, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
Hello,
Hi Roger,
The first two patches in the series fix a race with concurrent device
addition/removal and two bugs related to manipulation of the list of
active
domains in the devd subcomman
On 16/05/17 08:59, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
Hello,
Hi Roger,
The first two patches in the series fix a race with concurrent device
addition/removal and two bugs related to manipulation of the list of active
domains in the devd subcommand. The last patch is not a bugfix itself, but
it makes the
Hello,
The first two patches in the series fix a race with concurrent device
addition/removal and two bugs related to manipulation of the list of active
domains in the devd subcommand. The last patch is not a bugfix itself, but
it makes the code easier to understand.
IMHO they should be part of 4
