Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/pvh: Handle hypercalls for 32b PVH guests

2015-08-11 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 24.07.15 at 20:35, wrote: > On 07/23/2015 10:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 11.07.15 at 00:20, wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky >>> --- >>> Changes in v3: >>> * Defined compat_mmuext_op(). (XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(mmuext_op_compat_t) >>>is not defined in header files so I

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/pvh: Handle hypercalls for 32b PVH guests

2015-07-24 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 07/23/2015 10:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 11.07.15 at 00:20, wrote: Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky --- Changes in v3: * Defined compat_mmuext_op(). (XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(mmuext_op_compat_t) is not defined in header files so I used 'void' type. How is it not? It's in compat/xen.h (whi

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/pvh: Handle hypercalls for 32b PVH guests

2015-07-23 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 11.07.15 at 00:20, wrote: > Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky > --- > Changes in v3: > * Defined compat_mmuext_op(). (XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(mmuext_op_compat_t) > is not defined in header files so I used 'void' type. How is it not? It's in compat/xen.h (which is a generated header). > @@

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/pvh: Handle hypercalls for 32b PVH guests

2015-07-10 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky --- Changes in v3: * Defined compat_mmuext_op(). (XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(mmuext_op_compat_t) is not defined in header files so I used 'void' type. I am not convinced this is the best solution) xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 33 - 1 fil