Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 10/18] x86emul: test coverage for SSE/SSE2 insns

2017-02-20 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 20/02/17 15:40, Jan Beulich wrote: On 20.02.17 at 16:24, wrote: >> On 15/02/17 11:13, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> --- a/tools/tests/x86_emulator/Makefile >>> +++ b/tools/tests/x86_emulator/Makefile >>> @@ -11,11 +11,36 @@ all: $(TARGET) >>> run: $(TARGET) >>> ./$(TARGET) >>> >>> -TESTCAS

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 10/18] x86emul: test coverage for SSE/SSE2 insns

2017-02-20 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 20.02.17 at 16:24, wrote: > On 15/02/17 11:13, Jan Beulich wrote: >> --- a/tools/tests/x86_emulator/Makefile >> +++ b/tools/tests/x86_emulator/Makefile >> @@ -11,11 +11,36 @@ all: $(TARGET) >> run: $(TARGET) >> ./$(TARGET) >> >> -TESTCASES := blowfish >> +TESTCASES := blowfish simd

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 10/18] x86emul: test coverage for SSE/SSE2 insns

2017-02-20 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 15/02/17 11:13, Jan Beulich wrote: > --- a/tools/tests/x86_emulator/Makefile > +++ b/tools/tests/x86_emulator/Makefile > @@ -11,11 +11,36 @@ all: $(TARGET) > run: $(TARGET) > ./$(TARGET) > > -TESTCASES := blowfish > +TESTCASES := blowfish simd > > blowfish-cflags := "" > blowfish-cf

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 10/18] x86emul: test coverage for SSE/SSE2 insns

2017-02-15 Thread Jan Beulich
... and their AVX equivalents. Note that a few instructions aren't covered (yet), but those all fall into common pattern groups, so I would hope that for now we can do with what is there. MMX insns aren't being covered at all, as they're not easy to deal with: The compiler refuses to emit such for