On 23/02/15 15:15, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 17:03 +, Julien Grall wrote:
>> On 20/02/15 15:42, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 14:25 +, Julien Grall wrote:
@@ -919,8 +943,14 @@ static int make_timer_node(const struct domain *d,
void *fdt,
Hi Ian,
On 23/02/15 15:12, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 17:01 +, Julien Grall wrote:
diff --git a/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/passthrough.txt
b/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/passthrough.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000..04645b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 17:03 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 20/02/15 15:42, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 14:25 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> >> @@ -919,8 +943,14 @@ static int make_timer_node(const struct domain *d,
> >> void *fdt,
> >> return res;
> >> }
> >>
> >> -/* Map
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 17:01 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> >> diff --git a/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/passthrough.txt
> >> b/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/passthrough.txt
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000..04645b3
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/passthrough.txt
> >> @@
Hi Ian,
On 20/02/15 15:38, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 14:25 +, Julien Grall wrote:
>> When a device is marked for passthrough (via the new property
>> "xen,passthrough"),
>> dom0 must not access to the device (i.e not loading a driver), but should
>
> "must not access the de
On 20/02/15 15:42, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 14:25 +, Julien Grall wrote:
>> @@ -919,8 +943,14 @@ static int make_timer_node(const struct domain *d, void
>> *fdt,
>> return res;
>> }
>>
>> -/* Map the device in the domain */
>> -static int map_device(struct domain *d,
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 14:25 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> @@ -919,8 +943,14 @@ static int make_timer_node(const struct domain *d, void
> *fdt,
> return res;
> }
>
> -/* Map the device in the domain */
> -static int map_device(struct domain *d, struct dt_device_node *dev)
> +/* For a given d
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 14:25 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> When a device is marked for passthrough (via the new property
> "xen,passthrough"),
> dom0 must not access to the device (i.e not loading a driver), but should
"must not access the device (i.e. not load a driver)"
perhaps "should still be
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 28/01/15 16:36, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
> >> When a device is marked for passthrough (via the new property
> >> "xen,passthrough"),
> >> dom0 must not access to the device (i.e not loading a driver), but s
On 28/01/15 16:36, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
>> When a device is marked for passthrough (via the new property
>> "xen,passthrough"),
>> dom0 must not access to the device (i.e not loading a driver), but should
>> be able to manage the MMIO/interrupt of th
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
> When a device is marked for passthrough (via the new property
> "xen,passthrough"),
> dom0 must not access to the device (i.e not loading a driver), but should
> be able to manage the MMIO/interrupt of the passthrough device.
>
> The latter part will all
When a device is marked for passthrough (via the new property
"xen,passthrough"),
dom0 must not access to the device (i.e not loading a driver), but should
be able to manage the MMIO/interrupt of the passthrough device.
The latter part will allow the toolstack to map MMIO/IRQ when a device
is pas
12 matches
Mail list logo
