On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 14:25 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> The check to avoid mapping disabled device in DOM0 was added in the
> anticipation
"disabled devices" and "in anticipation of device passthrough"
> of the device passthrough. But, a brand new property will be added later to
> mark
> devic
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 28/01/15 16:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
> >> The check to avoid mapping disabled device in DOM0 was added in the
> >> anticipation
> >> of the device passthrough. But, a brand new property
Hi Stefano,
On 28/01/15 16:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
>> The check to avoid mapping disabled device in DOM0 was added in the
>> anticipation
>> of the device passthrough. But, a brand new property will be added later to
>> mark
>> device which will p
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
> The check to avoid mapping disabled device in DOM0 was added in the
> anticipation
> of the device passthrough. But, a brand new property will be added later to
> mark
> device which will passthrough. At the same time, remove the memory type
> check beca
The check to avoid mapping disabled device in DOM0 was added in the anticipation
of the device passthrough. But, a brand new property will be added later to mark
device which will passthrough. At the same time, remove the memory type
check because those nodes has been blacklisted.
Futhermore, some
