Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 05/62] acpi: Don't do traditional BIOS table scan for ARM64

2015-11-23 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 24.11.15 at 04:39, wrote: > On 2015/11/23 19:35, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 23.11.15 at 12:24, wrote: >>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, shannon.z...@linaro.org wrote: --- a/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c +++ b/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c @@ -78,7 +78,9 @@ acpi_physical_address __init acpi_

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 05/62] acpi: Don't do traditional BIOS table scan for ARM64

2015-11-23 Thread Shannon Zhao
On 2015/11/23 19:35, Jan Beulich wrote: On 23.11.15 at 12:24, wrote: >> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, shannon.z...@linaro.org wrote: >>> From: Shannon Zhao >>> >>> With the addition of ARM64 that does not have a traditional BIOS to >>> scan, add a #ifdef option for x86 to do the traditional BIOS sc

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 05/62] acpi: Don't do traditional BIOS table scan for ARM64

2015-11-23 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 23.11.15 at 12:24, wrote: > On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, shannon.z...@linaro.org wrote: >> From: Shannon Zhao >> >> With the addition of ARM64 that does not have a traditional BIOS to >> scan, add a #ifdef option for x86 to do the traditional BIOS scanning >> for tables. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sha

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 05/62] acpi: Don't do traditional BIOS table scan for ARM64

2015-11-23 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, shannon.z...@linaro.org wrote: > From: Shannon Zhao > > With the addition of ARM64 that does not have a traditional BIOS to > scan, add a #ifdef option for x86 to do the traditional BIOS scanning > for tables. > > Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao > --- > xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 05/62] acpi: Don't do traditional BIOS table scan for ARM64

2015-11-17 Thread shannon . zhao
From: Shannon Zhao With the addition of ARM64 that does not have a traditional BIOS to scan, add a #ifdef option for x86 to do the traditional BIOS scanning for tables. Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao --- xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/xen/drivers/acpi