Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 00/15] xen/arm: Bug fixes for the vGIC

2015-02-20 Thread Vijay Kilari
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > On 20/02/15 10:44, Ian Campbell wrote: >> On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 15:56 +0530, Vijay Kilari wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Ian Campbell >>> wrote: On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 18:01 +, Julien Grall wrote: > Based on the disc

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 00/15] xen/arm: Bug fixes for the vGIC

2015-02-20 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Ian, On 20/02/15 10:14, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 18:01 +, Julien Grall wrote: >> Based on the discussion, what about waiting until someone complain about >> GICv3 support on Xen 4.5? > > That sounds like a reasonable compromise. > > My potential backports list now conta

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 00/15] xen/arm: Bug fixes for the vGIC

2015-02-20 Thread Julien Grall
On 20/02/15 10:44, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 15:56 +0530, Vijay Kilari wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Ian Campbell >> wrote: >>> On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 18:01 +, Julien Grall wrote: Based on the discussion, what about waiting until someone complain about

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 00/15] xen/arm: Bug fixes for the vGIC

2015-02-20 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 15:56 +0530, Vijay Kilari wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 18:01 +, Julien Grall wrote: > >> Based on the discussion, what about waiting until someone complain about > >> GICv3 support on Xen 4.5? > > > > That sounds

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 00/15] xen/arm: Bug fixes for the vGIC

2015-02-20 Thread Vijay Kilari
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 18:01 +, Julien Grall wrote: >> Based on the discussion, what about waiting until someone complain about >> GICv3 support on Xen 4.5? > > That sounds like a reasonable compromise. If Xen 4.5 claims GICv3 support, the

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 00/15] xen/arm: Bug fixes for the vGIC

2015-02-20 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 18:01 +, Julien Grall wrote: > Based on the discussion, what about waiting until someone complain about > GICv3 support on Xen 4.5? That sounds like a reasonable compromise. My potential backports list now contains: xen/arm: Bug fixes for the vGIC -> 15 patch series, ma

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 00/15] xen/arm: Bug fixes for the vGIC

2015-02-19 Thread Julien Grall
On 19/02/15 17:48, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 17:34 +, Julien Grall wrote: >> On 19/02/15 17:21, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 14:50 +, Julien Grall wrote: >>> >>> All applied, thanks. >>> Most of this patches should be backported to Xen 4.5/Xen 4.5 (se

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 00/15] xen/arm: Bug fixes for the vGIC

2015-02-19 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 17:34 +, Julien Grall wrote: > On 19/02/15 17:21, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 14:50 +, Julien Grall wrote: > > > > All applied, thanks. > > > >> Most of this patches should be backported to Xen 4.5/Xen 4.5 (see each > >> patch). > >> Although, the

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 00/15] xen/arm: Bug fixes for the vGIC

2015-02-19 Thread Julien Grall
On 19/02/15 17:21, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 14:50 +, Julien Grall wrote: > > All applied, thanks. > >> Most of this patches should be backported to Xen 4.5/Xen 4.5 (see each >> patch). >> Although, the one in GICv2 are not critical. > > Do you have a handy index of which

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 00/15] xen/arm: Bug fixes for the vGIC

2015-02-19 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 14:50 +, Julien Grall wrote: All applied, thanks. > Most of this patches should be backported to Xen 4.5/Xen 4.5 (see each patch). > Although, the one in GICv2 are not critical. Do you have a handy index of which ones do/don't need backporting to save me trawling throug

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 00/15] xen/arm: Bug fixes for the vGIC

2015-02-16 Thread Julien Grall
Hello, The first goal of this series is to fix Linux 3.19 DOM0 boot on GICv3 systems (see patch #1). It turns out to a bigger series because there were some outstanding bugs in the vGIC emulation. The most important one is the way we emulate the re-distributor. Each re-distributor should be assoc