Hi All,
Great thanks for all your help :-)
On 25 April 2016 at 23:25, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH v3] docs/arm64: update the documention for
>> loading XSM support"):
>> > Stefano has committed the previous version wit
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH v3] docs/arm64: update the documention for
> loading XSM support"):
> > Stefano has committed the previous version with some modifications. Is
> > it better to read?
>
> IMO it is better than the original but I still thin
Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH v3] docs/arm64: update the documention for
loading XSM support"):
> Stefano has committed the previous version with some modifications. Is
> it better to read?
IMO it is better than the original but I still think my proposed
wording is an improvement over Stefano
Hi Ian,
On 22/04/16 18:29, Ian Jackson wrote:
Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH v2] docs/arm64: update the documention for loading
XSM support"):
The new version looks good to me:
Acked-by: Julien Grall
Can a native speaker (Ian, Konrad, George) double-check the wording)?
I found it rather
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 06:29:34PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH v2] docs/arm64: update the documention for
> loading XSM support"):
> > The new version looks good to me:
> > Acked-by: Julien Grall
> >
> > Can a native speaker (Ian, Konrad, George) double-check the
Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH v2] docs/arm64: update the documention for
loading XSM support"):
> The new version looks good to me:
> Acked-by: Julien Grall
>
> Can a native speaker (Ian, Konrad, George) double-check the wording)?
I found it rather difficult to read. See updated version, at
