Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] displif: add ABI for para-virtual display

2017-03-01 Thread Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Hi, Konrad! On 02/17/2017 07:33 PM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: On 02/17/2017 06:33 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:36:01AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: On 02/15/2017 11:33 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: .snip.. I will define 2 sections: *--

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] displif: add ABI for para-virtual display

2017-02-17 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> > > Stefano, you wouldn't have an patch for the ring.h somewhere > > > would you? > > I do have all the headers and macros for both pvcalls and 9pfs (see > > below the 9pfs header), but not yet something generic used by both. > > However, it shouldn't be difficult to generalize it. I'll submit a

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] displif: add ABI for para-virtual display

2017-02-17 Thread Oleksandr Andrushchenko
On 02/17/2017 09:12 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:36:01AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: On 02/15/2017 11:33 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: .snip.. I will define 2 sections: *-- Connecto

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] displif: add ABI for para-virtual display

2017-02-17 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:36:01AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > > On 02/15/2017 11:33 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > .snip.. > > > > > > > > I will define 2 sections: > > > > > > > > *-- Connector Request Tra

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] displif: add ABI for para-virtual display

2017-02-17 Thread Oleksandr Andrushchenko
On 02/17/2017 06:33 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:36:01AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: On 02/15/2017 11:33 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: .snip.. I will define 2 sections: *-- Connector Request Transport Parameters -

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] displif: add ABI for para-virtual display

2017-02-17 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:36:01AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > On 02/15/2017 11:33 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > .snip.. > > > > > > > I will define 2 sections: > > > > > > > *-- Connector Request Transport Parameters > > > > > > > --- > > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] displif: add ABI for para-virtual display

2017-02-16 Thread Oleksandr Andrushchenko
On 02/15/2017 11:33 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: .snip.. I will define 2 sections: *-- Connector Request Transport Parameters --- * * ctrl-event-channel * ctrl-ring-ref * *--- Connector Event Transport Parameters ---

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] displif: add ABI for para-virtual display

2017-02-15 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
.snip.. > > > > > I will define 2 sections: > > > > >*-- Connector Request Transport Parameters > > > > > --- > > > > >* > > > > >* ctrl-event-channel > > > > >* ctrl-ring-ref > > > > >* > > > > >*--- Connector Event Transport

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] displif: add ABI for para-virtual display

2017-02-15 Thread Oleksandr Andrushchenko
On 02/15/2017 05:45 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 09:33:41AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: On 02/14/2017 10:27 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:50:49AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: Hi, Konrad! Thank you for reviewing this.

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] displif: add ABI for para-virtual display

2017-02-15 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 09:33:41AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > On 02/14/2017 10:27 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:50:49AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > > > Hi, Konrad! > > > > > > Thank you for reviewing this. > > > > > > On 02/10/2017 11:27

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] displif: add ABI for para-virtual display

2017-02-14 Thread Oleksandr Andrushchenko
On 02/14/2017 10:27 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:50:49AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: Hi, Konrad! Thank you for reviewing this. On 02/10/2017 11:27 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 09:29:58AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] displif: add ABI for para-virtual display

2017-02-14 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:50:49AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > Hi, Konrad! > > Thank you for reviewing this. > > On 02/10/2017 11:27 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 09:29:58AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > > > From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] displif: add ABI for para-virtual display

2017-02-13 Thread Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Hi, Konrad! Thank you for reviewing this. On 02/10/2017 11:27 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 09:29:58AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko This is the ABI for the two halves of a para-virtualized display driver. This protocol aims t

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] displif: add ABI for para-virtual display

2017-02-10 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 09:29:58AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko > > This is the ABI for the two halves of a para-virtualized > display driver. > > This protocol aims to provide a unified protocol which fits more > sophisticated use-cases than a framebuffe

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] displif: add ABI for para-virtual display

2017-02-09 Thread Oleksandr Andrushchenko
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko This is the ABI for the two halves of a para-virtualized display driver. This protocol aims to provide a unified protocol which fits more sophisticated use-cases than a framebuffer device can handle. At the moment basic functionality is supported with the intention

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] displif: add ABI for para-virtual display

2017-02-09 Thread Oleksandr Andrushchenko
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko This is the ABI for the two halves of a para-virtualized display driver. This protocol aims to provide a unified protocol which fits more sophisticated use-cases than a framebuffer device can handle. At the moment basic functionality is supported with the intention