On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 16:54 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:31:11AM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Return value of libxl_basename was erroneously marked as "const". This
> > series removes that "const" and fixes two memory leaks in xl.
> >
> > I think these fixes should
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:31:11AM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> Return value of libxl_basename was erroneously marked as "const". This
> series removes that "const" and fixes two memory leaks in xl.
>
> I think these fixes should be included in 4.5, given that they fix real
> issues and are very straig
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:40:09AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 11:31 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Return value of libxl_basename was erroneously marked as "const". This
> > series removes that "const" and fixes two memory leaks in xl.
> >
> > I think these fixes should be inclu
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 11:50 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:40:09AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 11:31 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > Return value of libxl_basename was erroneously marked as "const". This
> > > series removes that "const" and fixes two memory
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 11:31 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> Return value of libxl_basename was erroneously marked as "const". This
> series removes that "const" and fixes two memory leaks in xl.
>
> I think these fixes should be included in 4.5, given that they fix real
> issues and are very straight fowa
Return value of libxl_basename was erroneously marked as "const". This
series removes that "const" and fixes two memory leaks in xl.
I think these fixes should be included in 4.5, given that they fix real
issues and are very straight foward to reason about.
Wei.
Wei Liu (2):
libxl: un-constify
