On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 18:42 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Andrew Cooper
> wrote:
> > Is it a candidate for dropping from the hypervisor then? No use keeping
> > useless tracepoints.
>
> Well it would have to be replaced with something more informative.
>
Indeed.
On Fri, May 08, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 10:35:42AM +, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > +void sched_class(struct record_info *ri)
> > +{
> > +}
> Huh, this does nothing? Is it because this is only a stub (you haven't
> got around to implement it) or it is supposed to be like this?
Whate
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 10:35:42AM +, Olaf Hering wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering
> Cc: Ian Jackson
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini
> Cc: Ian Campbell
> Cc: Wei Liu
> ---
> tools/xentrace/xenalyze/xenalyze.c | 73
> ++
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+),
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 07/05/15 18:13, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> +case TRC_SCHED_ADJDOM:
>>> > +printf(" %s sched_adjdom domid d%u\n",
>>> > + ri->dump_header, ri->d[0]);
>>> > +break;
>> Wow, this has got to be on
On 07/05/15 18:13, George Dunlap wrote:
>> +case TRC_SCHED_ADJDOM:
>> > +printf(" %s sched_adjdom domid d%u\n",
>> > + ri->dump_header, ri->d[0]);
>> > +break;
> Wow, this has got to be one of the most useless trace points
> ever...
>
Is it a candi
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Olaf Hering wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering
> Cc: Ian Jackson
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini
> Cc: Ian Campbell
> Cc: Wei Liu
[snip]
> +case TRC_SCHED_ADJDOM:
> +printf(" %s sched_adjdom domid d%u\n",
> + ri->dump_header,
Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering
Cc: Ian Jackson
Cc: Stefano Stabellini
Cc: Ian Campbell
Cc: Wei Liu
---
tools/xentrace/xenalyze/xenalyze.c | 73 ++
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/xentrace/xenalyze/xenalyze.c
b/tools/xentrac
