On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 14:47 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/17/2015 03:33 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > Such scratch area can be used to kill most of the
> > cpumasks{_var}_t local variables in other functions
> > in the file, but that is *NOT* done in this chage.
> >
> > Finally, convert the
On 03/17/2015 03:33 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> In fact, printing the cpupool's CPU online mask
> for each vCPU is just redundant, as that is the
> same for all the vCPUs of all the domains in the
> same cpupool, while hard affinity is already part
> of the output of dumping domains info.
>
> Inst
2015-03-17 11:33 GMT-04:00 Dario Faggioli :
> In fact, printing the cpupool's CPU online mask
> for each vCPU is just redundant, as that is the
> same for all the vCPUs of all the domains in the
> same cpupool, while hard affinity is already part
> of the output of dumping domains info.
>
> Instead
In fact, printing the cpupool's CPU online mask
for each vCPU is just redundant, as that is the
same for all the vCPUs of all the domains in the
same cpupool, while hard affinity is already part
of the output of dumping domains info.
Instead, print the intersection between hard
affinity and online
