On 12/14/2016 05:18 AM, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> On 12/14/16 18:11 +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
>> ... because INVALID_PADDR is a more general one.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Jan Beulich
>> Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang
>> ---
>> xen/arch/x86/hvm/nestedhvm.c | 2 +-
>> xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/nestedsvm.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 03:16:33AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 14.12.16 at 11:11, wrote:
> > ... because INVALID_PADDR is a more general one.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Jan Beulich
> > Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang
>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
>
> Thanks for doing this!
Indeed! Thank you.
> From: Zhang, Haozhong
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 6:12 PM
>
> ... because INVALID_PADDR is a more general one.
>
> Suggested-by: Jan Beulich
> Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lis
On 12/14/16 18:11 +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
... because INVALID_PADDR is a more general one.
Suggested-by: Jan Beulich
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/nestedhvm.c | 2 +-
xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/nestedsvm.c | 18 +-
xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vmcb.c | 2 +-
>>> On 14.12.16 at 11:11, wrote:
> ... because INVALID_PADDR is a more general one.
>
> Suggested-by: Jan Beulich
> Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
Thanks for doing this!
Jan
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.
... because INVALID_PADDR is a more general one.
Suggested-by: Jan Beulich
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/nestedhvm.c | 2 +-
xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/nestedsvm.c | 18 +-
xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vmcb.c | 2 +-
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c | 16 ++