On 08/03/17 17:46, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> Instead of using a locking order based on line numbers which interacts
> poorly with trying to create a live patch, statically define the locking
> order.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall
> Reviewed-by: Dario Faggioli
Acked-by: George Dunlap
> ---
>
Instead of using a locking order based on line numbers which interacts
poorly with trying to create a live patch, statically define the locking
order.
Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall
Reviewed-by: Dario Faggioli
---
Changes in v2:
* Rearranged defines.
* Make lock orders fit in a sign-extended 8-b