>>> On 05.04.16 at 12:55, wrote:
> On 04/05/2016 11:09 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 29.03.16 at 15:44, wrote:
>>> +if ( rc <= 0 )
>>> +return rc;
>>> +
>>> +plt_mask = (u64)~0ull >> (64 - pts->counter_bits);
>>> +
>>> +set_time_scale(&plt_scale, pts->frequency);
>>> +
>>> +
On 04/05/2016 11:09 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.03.16 at 15:44, wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
>> @@ -533,6 +533,30 @@ static void resume_platform_timer(void)
>> plt_stamp = plt_src.read_counter();
>> }
>>
>> +static int __init try_platform_timer(str
>>> On 29.03.16 at 15:44, wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
> @@ -533,6 +533,30 @@ static void resume_platform_timer(void)
> plt_stamp = plt_src.read_counter();
> }
>
> +static int __init try_platform_timer(struct platform_timesource *pts)
> +{
> +int rc =
On 04/01/2016 05:10 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 02:44:07PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote:
>> And accomodate platform time source initialization in
>> try_platform_time(). This is a preparatory patch for deferring
>> TSC clocksource initialization to the stage where all
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 02:44:07PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote:
> And accomodate platform time source initialization in
> try_platform_time(). This is a preparatory patch for deferring
> TSC clocksource initialization to the stage where all CPUS are
> up (verify_tsc_reliability init call).
>
> Signe
And accomodate platform time source initialization in
try_platform_time(). This is a preparatory patch for deferring
TSC clocksource initialization to the stage where all CPUS are
up (verify_tsc_reliability init call).
Signed-off-by: Joao Martins
---
Cc: Keir Fraser
Cc: Jan Beulich
Cc: Andrew C
