On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 04:11:31AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 20.06.16 at 11:09, wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:45:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 17.06.16 at 15:50, wrote:
> >> > On 17/06/16 12:05, Wei Liu wrote:
> >> >> @@ -182,6 +183,28 @@ static int __init hvm_enable
>>> On 20.06.16 at 11:09, wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:45:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 17.06.16 at 15:50, wrote:
>> > On 17/06/16 12:05, Wei Liu wrote:
>> >> @@ -182,6 +183,28 @@ static int __init hvm_enable(void)
>> >> if ( !opt_altp2m_enabled )
>> >> hvm_funcs.a
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:45:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 17.06.16 at 15:50, wrote:
> > On 17/06/16 12:05, Wei Liu wrote:
> >> @@ -182,6 +183,28 @@ static int __init hvm_enable(void)
> >> if ( !opt_altp2m_enabled )
> >> hvm_funcs.altp2m_supported = 0;
> >>
> >> +if
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:55:04AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 17.06.16 at 16:44, wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:40:40AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 17.06.16 at 16:32, wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:28:34AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> >>> On 17.06.16 at 15:
>>> On 17.06.16 at 16:44, wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:40:40AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 17.06.16 at 16:32, wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:28:34AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> >>> On 17.06.16 at 15:51, wrote:
>> >> > On 17/06/16 12:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> > O
>>> On 17.06.16 at 15:50, wrote:
> On 17/06/16 12:05, Wei Liu wrote:
>> @@ -182,6 +183,28 @@ static int __init hvm_enable(void)
>> if ( !opt_altp2m_enabled )
>> hvm_funcs.altp2m_supported = 0;
>>
>> +if ( opt_hvm_fep )
>> +{
>> +unsigned int i, j;
>> +
>> +p
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:40:40AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 17.06.16 at 16:32, wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:28:34AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 17.06.16 at 15:51, wrote:
> >> > On 17/06/16 12:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> > On 17.06.16 at 13:05, wrote:
> >> >>> ---
>>> On 17.06.16 at 16:32, wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:28:34AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 17.06.16 at 15:51, wrote:
>> > On 17/06/16 12:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > On 17.06.16 at 13:05, wrote:
>> >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> >>> @@ -59,6
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:28:34AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 17.06.16 at 15:51, wrote:
> > On 17/06/16 12:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 17.06.16 at 13:05, wrote:
> >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
> >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
> >>> @@ -59,6 +59,20 @@ config BIGMEM
> >>>
> >>>
>>> On 17.06.16 at 15:51, wrote:
> On 17/06/16 12:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 17.06.16 at 13:05, wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>> @@ -59,6 +59,20 @@ config BIGMEM
>>>
>>> If unsure, say N.
>>>
>>> +config HVM_FEP
>>> + bool "HVM Forced Emula
On 17/06/16 12:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.06.16 at 13:05, wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> @@ -59,6 +59,20 @@ config BIGMEM
>>
>>If unsure, say N.
>>
>> +config HVM_FEP
>> +bool "HVM Forced Emulation Prefix support"
> And no "if EXPERT"?
On 17/06/16 12:05, Wei Liu wrote:
> Originally hvm_fep was guarded by NDEBUG, which means it was only
> available to debug builds.
>
> However there is value to have it for non-debug builds as well. User can
> use that to run tests in setup that replicates production setup.
>
> Make it clear with a
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:34:07AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 17.06.16 at 13:05, wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > @@ -59,6 +59,20 @@ config BIGMEM
> >
> > If unsure, say N.
> >
> > +config HVM_FEP
> > + bool "HVM Forced Emulation Prefix s
>>> On 17.06.16 at 13:05, wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -59,6 +59,20 @@ config BIGMEM
>
> If unsure, say N.
>
> +config HVM_FEP
> + bool "HVM Forced Emulation Prefix support"
And no "if EXPERT"?
> @@ -95,9 +96,9 @@ unsigned long __section("
Originally hvm_fep was guarded by NDEBUG, which means it was only
available to debug builds.
However there is value to have it for non-debug builds as well. User can
use that to run tests in setup that replicates production setup.
Make it clear with a sync_console style warning that this option c
15 matches
Mail list logo