>>> On 06.09.16 at 23:18, wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 09:11:15AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 25.08.16 at 15:37, wrote:
>> > --- a/xen/common/livepatch_elf.c
>> > +++ b/xen/common/livepatch_elf.c
>> > @@ -71,7 +71,15 @@ static int elf_resolve_sections(struct livepatch_elf
>> > *elf,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 09:11:15AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 25.08.16 at 15:37, wrote:
> > On most architectures it does not matter what the aligment is.
> >
> > On ARM32 it is paramount that the aligment is word-size (4)
> > otherwise we get a Data Abort when trying to perform ELF
> > r
Hi,
On 25/08/16 16:11, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.08.16 at 15:37, wrote:
On most architectures it does not matter what the aligment is.
On ARM32 it is paramount that the aligment is word-size (4)
otherwise we get a Data Abort when trying to perform ELF
relocations. That is due to ARM 32 only be
>>> On 25.08.16 at 15:37, wrote:
> On most architectures it does not matter what the aligment is.
>
> On ARM32 it is paramount that the aligment is word-size (4)
> otherwise we get a Data Abort when trying to perform ELF
> relocations. That is due to ARM 32 only being able to write to
> word-alig
On most architectures it does not matter what the aligment is.
On ARM32 it is paramount that the aligment is word-size (4)
otherwise we get a Data Abort when trying to perform ELF
relocations. That is due to ARM 32 only being able to write to
word-aligned addresses.
The default section alignments
