On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 11:39 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 23/10/15 11:39, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 18:17 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 22/10/15 16:42, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 16:39 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Su
On 23/10/15 11:39, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 18:17 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 22/10/15 16:42, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 16:39 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>
>>> Subject: support PSCI v1.0 for the host.
>>>
From Xen point of view, PSCI v0.2
On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 18:17 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 22/10/15 16:42, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 16:39 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> >
> > Subject: support PSCI v1.0 for the host.
> >
> > > From Xen point of view, PSCI v0.2 and PSCI v1.0 are very similar. All
> >
Hi,
On 22/10/15 16:42, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 16:39 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> Subject: support PSCI v1.0 for the host.
>
>> From Xen point of view, PSCI v0.2 and PSCI v1.0 are very similar. All
>Xen's
>
>> the PSCI calls used within Xen (PSCI_VERSION, CPU_ON, S
On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 16:39 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Subject: support PSCI v1.0 for the host.
> From Xen point of view, PSCI v0.2 and PSCI v1.0 are very similar. All
Xen's
> the PSCI calls used within Xen (PSCI_VERSION, CPU_ON, SYSTEM_OFF and
> SYSTEM_RESET) behaves exactly the same.
>From Xen point of view, PSCI v0.2 and PSCI v1.0 are very similar. All
the PSCI calls used within Xen (PSCI_VERSION, CPU_ON, SYSTEM_OFF and
SYSTEM_RESET) behaves exactly the same.
Furthermore, based on the spec (5.3.1 DEN0022C), any 1.y version must be
compatible with 1.x when y > x for any functi
