>>> On 30.09.16 at 17:02, wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 07:21:41AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 30.09.16 at 13:27, wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 08:18:36AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> >>> On 27.09.16 at 17:57, wrote:
>> >> > +{
>> >> > +int rc;
>> >> > +
>> >> > +whil
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 07:21:41AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 30.09.16 at 13:27, wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 08:18:36AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 27.09.16 at 17:57, wrote:
> >> > +{
> >> > +int rc;
> >> > +
> >> > +while ( nr_pages > 0 )
> >> > +{
> >> > +
>>> On 30.09.16 at 13:27, wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 08:18:36AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 27.09.16 at 17:57, wrote:
>> > +{
>> > +int rc;
>> > +
>> > +while ( nr_pages > 0 )
>> > +{
>> > +rc = (map ? map_mmio_regions : unmap_mmio_regions)
>> > + (d,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 08:18:36AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 27.09.16 at 17:57, wrote:
> > The current code used by Intel VTd will only map RMRR regions for the
> > hardware domain, but will fail to map RMRR regions for unprivileged domains
> > unless the page tables are shared between EP
>>> On 27.09.16 at 17:57, wrote:
> The current code used by Intel VTd will only map RMRR regions for the
> hardware domain, but will fail to map RMRR regions for unprivileged domains
> unless the page tables are shared between EPT and IOMMU.
Okay, if that's the case it surely should get fixed.
>
The current code used by Intel VTd will only map RMRR regions for the
hardware domain, but will fail to map RMRR regions for unprivileged domains
unless the page tables are shared between EPT and IOMMU. Fix this and
simplify the code, removing the {set/clear}_identity_p2m_entry helpers and
just usi
