Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 08/17] x86emul: fold/eliminate some local variables

2017-10-06 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 06.10.17 at 16:21, wrote: > On 09/14/2017 04:16 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Make i switch-wide (at once making it unsigned, as it should have been) >> and introduce n (for immediate use in enter and aam/aad handling). >> Eliminate on-stack arrays in pusha/popa handling. Use ea.val instead of

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 08/17] x86emul: fold/eliminate some local variables

2017-10-06 Thread George Dunlap
On 09/14/2017 04:16 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: > Make i switch-wide (at once making it unsigned, as it should have been) > and introduce n (for immediate use in enter and aam/aad handling). > Eliminate on-stack arrays in pusha/popa handling. Use ea.val instead of > a custom variable in bound handling.

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 08/17] x86emul: fold/eliminate some local variables

2017-10-06 Thread George Dunlap
On 09/14/2017 04:16 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: > Make i switch-wide (at once making it unsigned, as it should have been) > and introduce n (for immediate use in enter and aam/aad handling). > Eliminate on-stack arrays in pusha/popa handling. Use ea.val instead of > a custom variable in bound handling.

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 08/17] x86emul: fold/eliminate some local variables

2017-09-15 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 14/09/17 16:16, Jan Beulich wrote: Make i switch-wide (at once making it unsigned, as it should have been) and introduce n (for immediate use in enter and aam/aad handling). Eliminate on-stack arrays in pusha/popa handling. Use ea.val instead of a custom variable in bound handling. No (intend

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 08/17] x86emul: fold/eliminate some local variables

2017-09-14 Thread Jan Beulich
Make i switch-wide (at once making it unsigned, as it should have been) and introduce n (for immediate use in enter and aam/aad handling). Eliminate on-stack arrays in pusha/popa handling. Use ea.val instead of a custom variable in bound handling. No (intended) functional change. Signed-off-by: J