On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 14:42 +, George Dunlap wrote:
> Most of the motion makes sense, but moving the option parser along
> too
> seems a bit strange. Wouldn't it make more sense to leave it with
> the
> other option parsers?
>
Well, it's a runqueue related parameter, so it's runqueue related
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Dario Faggioli
wrote:
> So that they're all close among each other, and
> also near to the comment describind the runqueue
> organization (which is also moved).
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli
> ---
> Cc: George Dunlap
> Cc: An
So that they're all close among each other, and
also near to the comment describind the runqueue
organization (which is also moved).
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli
---
Cc: George Dunlap
Cc: Anshul Makkar
---
xen/common/sched_credit2.c | 572 +
