+shannon
On 24 May 2015 at 13:01, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Parth,
>
> On 24/05/2015 07:40, Parth Dixit wrote:
>>
>> On 17/05/15 21:03, Parth Dixit wrote:
>> > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile b/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
>> > index 935999e..096e9ef 100644
>> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/M
Hi Parth,
On 24/05/2015 07:40, Parth Dixit wrote:
On 17/05/15 21:03, Parth Dixit wrote:
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile b/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
> index 935999e..096e9ef 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ subdir-$
On 18 May 2015 at 18:56, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Parth,
>
> On 17/05/15 21:03, Parth Dixit wrote:
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile b/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
> > index 935999e..096e9ef 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
> > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
> > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ subdir-$(arm32) +
On 20/05/15 17:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.05.15 at 22:03, wrote:
>> --- a/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c
>> +++ b/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c
>> @@ -87,16 +87,7 @@ acpi_physical_address __init
>> acpi_os_get_root_pointer(void)
>> void __iomem *
>> acpi_os_map_memory(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_s
>>> On 17.05.15 at 22:03, wrote:
> --- a/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> @@ -87,16 +87,7 @@ acpi_physical_address __init acpi_os_get_root_pointer(void)
> void __iomem *
> acpi_os_map_memory(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size)
> {
> - if (system_state >= SYS_S
On 18/05/15 15:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.05.15 at 16:20, wrote:
>> Although, acpi_os_map_iomem is also part of the ACPI CA. Would a
>> function arch_acpi_os_map_memory suit for you?
>
> Only if we - other than Linux - really need this to be arch dependent.
The current implementation of a
>>> On 18.05.15 at 16:20, wrote:
> Although, acpi_os_map_iomem is also part of the ACPI CA. Would a
> function arch_acpi_os_map_memory suit for you?
Only if we - other than Linux - really need this to be arch dependent.
Jan
___
Xen-devel mailing list
On 18/05/15 15:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.05.15 at 15:26, wrote:
>> On 17/05/15 21:03, Parth Dixit wrote:
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/acpi/lib.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
>>> +#include
>>> +#include
>>> +
>>> +void __iomem *
>>> +acpi_os_map_iomem(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_s
>>> On 18.05.15 at 15:26, wrote:
> On 17/05/15 21:03, Parth Dixit wrote:
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/acpi/lib.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
>> +#include
>> +#include
>> +
>> +void __iomem *
>> +acpi_os_map_iomem(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size)
>> +{
>> +return __va(phys);
>> +}
Hi Parth,
On 17/05/15 21:03, Parth Dixit wrote:
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile b/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
> index 935999e..096e9ef 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ subdir-$(arm32) += arm32
> subdir-$(arm64) += arm64
> subdir-y += platforms
>
common acpi code for memory mapping is specific to x86.
Add a new helper function for mapping memory based on architecture.
Signed-off-by: Parth Dixit
---
xen/arch/arm/Makefile | 1 +
xen/arch/arm/acpi/Makefile | 1 +
xen/arch/arm/acpi/lib.c| 8
xen/arch/x86/acpi/lib.c|
11 matches
Mail list logo
