Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/22] Introduce HVM without dm and new boot ABI

2015-07-03 Thread Roger Pau Monné
El 03/07/15 a les 3.59, Yang Hongyang ha escrit: > Hi Roger, > > This seems to be a PVH guest, but IIRC a PVH guest should explicitly > specify 'pvh' in the config, maybe I'm wrong or did I miss some background? > Are there any meterial about this? Not yet. The interface exposed to the guest is

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/22] Introduce HVM without dm and new boot ABI

2015-07-02 Thread Yang Hongyang
Hi Roger, This seems to be a PVH guest, but IIRC a PVH guest should explicitly specify 'pvh' in the config, maybe I'm wrong or did I miss some background? Are there any meterial about this? On 07/01/2015 10:45 PM, Roger Pau Monne wrote: This series is split in the following order: - Patche

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/22] Introduce HVM without dm and new boot ABI

2015-07-01 Thread Roger Pau Monne
This series is split in the following order: - Patches from 1 to 10 switch HVM domain contruction to use the xc_dom_* family of functions, like they are used to build PV domains. - Patches from 11 to 22 introduce the creation of HVM domains without a device model, which is replaced by d