On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 03:21:46PM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 11:27 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 04:21:22AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > > > On 07.03.16 at 11:54, wrote:
> > > >
> > > Well, if these were urgent I'd say yes. But I don't think the
On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 11:27 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 04:21:22AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > > On 07.03.16 at 11:54, wrote:
> > >
> > Well, if these were urgent I'd say yes. But I don't think they are,
> > so I'd leave it to either Konrad (who has basically asked for w
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 04:21:22AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 07.03.16 at 11:54, wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 03:50:20AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 04.03.16 at 19:25, wrote:
> >> > Hello committers, George,
> >> >
> >> > This is basically a ping for this series, as I thi
>>> On 07.03.16 at 11:54, wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 03:50:20AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 04.03.16 at 19:25, wrote:
>> > Hello committers, George,
>> >
>> > This is basically a ping for this series, as I think most of it can
>> > actually go in, unless I've missed something.
>> >
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 03:50:20AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 04.03.16 at 19:25, wrote:
> > Hello committers, George,
> >
> > This is basically a ping for this series, as I think most of it can
> > actually go in, unless I've missed something.
> >
> > So, let me try to recap:
> >
> > On
>>> On 04.03.16 at 19:25, wrote:
> Hello committers, George,
>
> This is basically a ping for this series, as I think most of it can
> actually go in, unless I've missed something.
>
> So, let me try to recap:
>
> On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 19:11 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>>
>> Dario Faggioli (1
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 07:25:30PM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> Hello committers, George,
>
> This is basically a ping for this series, as I think most of it can
> actually go in, unless I've missed something.
>
> So, let me try to recap:
>
> On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 19:11 +0100, Dario Faggioli w
Hello committers, George,
This is basically a ping for this series, as I think most of it can
actually go in, unless I've missed something.
So, let me try to recap:
On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 19:11 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>
> Dario Faggioli (16):
> xen: sched: __runq_tickle takes a useles
Hi,
Take 2 of this series. v1 is here:
http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-02/msg01016.html
Konrad's feedback taken into acount, which basically meant modifying a little
bit patch 3 ("xen: sched: improve domain creation tracing"), and adding two
simple patches to xentrace f
