Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] hvmctl hypercall

2016-06-24 Thread David Vrabel
On 24/06/16 15:25, Jan Beulich wrote: > > And then - what's your expectation? Any parts of this new > interface can subsequently be marked stable if we so wish. I > don't see why this needs to happen right away. Ok. David ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xe

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] hvmctl hypercall

2016-06-24 Thread George Dunlap
On 24/06/16 15:25, Jan Beulich wrote: On 24.06.16 at 15:51, wrote: >> On 24/06/16 14:37, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 24.06.16 at 15:27, wrote: On 24/06/16 11:35, Jan Beulich wrote: On 24.06.16 at 12:29, wrote: >> On 24/06/16 11:21, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> A long while

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] hvmctl hypercall

2016-06-24 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 24.06.16 at 15:51, wrote: > On 24/06/16 14:37, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 24.06.16 at 15:27, wrote: >>> On 24/06/16 11:35, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 24.06.16 at 12:29, wrote: > On 24/06/16 11:21, Jan Beulich wrote: >> A long while back separating out all control kind operatio

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] hvmctl hypercall

2016-06-24 Thread David Vrabel
On 24/06/16 14:37, Jan Beulich wrote: On 24.06.16 at 15:27, wrote: >> On 24/06/16 11:35, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 24.06.16 at 12:29, wrote: On 24/06/16 11:21, Jan Beulich wrote: > A long while back separating out all control kind operations (intended > for use by only the co

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] hvmctl hypercall

2016-06-24 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 24.06.16 at 15:27, wrote: > On 24/06/16 11:35, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 24.06.16 at 12:29, wrote: >>> On 24/06/16 11:21, Jan Beulich wrote: A long while back separating out all control kind operations (intended for use by only the control domain or device model) from the curre

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] hvmctl hypercall

2016-06-24 Thread David Vrabel
On 24/06/16 11:35, Jan Beulich wrote: On 24.06.16 at 12:29, wrote: >> On 24/06/16 11:21, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> A long while back separating out all control kind operations (intended >>> for use by only the control domain or device model) from the currect >>> hvmop hypercall has been discusse

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] hvmctl hypercall

2016-06-24 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 24.06.16 at 12:29, wrote: > On 24/06/16 11:21, Jan Beulich wrote: >> A long while back separating out all control kind operations (intended >> for use by only the control domain or device model) from the currect >> hvmop hypercall has been discussed. This series aims at finally making >> th

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] hvmctl hypercall

2016-06-24 Thread David Vrabel
On 24/06/16 11:21, Jan Beulich wrote: > A long while back separating out all control kind operations (intended > for use by only the control domain or device model) from the currect > hvmop hypercall has been discussed. This series aims at finally making > this reality (at once allowing to streamli

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] hvmctl hypercall

2016-06-24 Thread Jan Beulich
A long while back separating out all control kind operations (intended for use by only the control domain or device model) from the currect hvmop hypercall has been discussed. This series aims at finally making this reality (at once allowing to streamline the associated XSM checking). 01: public /