>>> On 18.12.15 at 15:30, wrote:
> On 12/18/2015 09:16 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 18.12.15 at 14:53, wrote:
>>> On 12/18/2015 08:02 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 18/12/15 10:11, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.12.15 at 21:22, wrote:
>> * Left non-MMCFG RO accesses unhandled (we hav
On 12/18/2015 09:16 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.12.15 at 14:53, wrote:
On 12/18/2015 08:02 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 18/12/15 10:11, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.12.15 at 21:22, wrote:
* Left non-MMCFG RO accesses unhandled (we havent't encountered those
accesses
yet with PVH dom0 and
>>> On 18.12.15 at 14:53, wrote:
> On 12/18/2015 08:02 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 18/12/15 10:11, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 17.12.15 at 21:22, wrote:
* Left non-MMCFG RO accesses unhandled (we havent't encountered those
> accesses
yet with PVH dom0 and it's probably better to
On 12/18/2015 08:02 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 18/12/15 10:11, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.12.15 at 21:22, wrote:
* Left non-MMCFG RO accesses unhandled (we havent't encountered those accesses
yet with PVH dom0 and it's probably better to fault on them and investigate
whether they are gues
On 18/12/15 10:11, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.12.15 at 21:22, wrote:
>> * Left non-MMCFG RO accesses unhandled (we havent't encountered those
>> accesses
>> yet with PVH dom0 and it's probably better to fault on them and investigate
>> whether they are guest's issues).
> I seriously questi
>>> On 17.12.15 at 21:22, wrote:
> * Left non-MMCFG RO accesses unhandled (we havent't encountered those accesses
> yet with PVH dom0 and it's probably better to fault on them and investigate
> whether they are guest's issues).
I seriously question this being a good approach, since I can't se
v2:
* Expanded npfec structure to include page's precense indicator (I took the
easy way out and didn't implement VMX's fine-grained status since I couldn't
figure out how to properly do it in SVM)
* s/mmio/mmcfg for some operations. I left mmio_ro_emulate_ctxt as is because
it is used for no
