On 01/06/16 15:15, Bhaktipriya Shridhar wrote:
> System workqueues have been able to handle high level of concurrency
> for a long time now and there's no reason to use dedicated workqueues
> just to gain concurrency. Replace dedicated xen_pcibk_wq with the
> use of system_wq.
>
> Unlike a dedica
Ping!
Thanks,
Bhaktipriya
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:45:08PM +0530, Bhaktipriya Shridhar wrote:
>> System workqueues have been able to handle high level of concurrency
>> for a long time now and there's no reason to use dedicated workqueues
>> j
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:45:08PM +0530, Bhaktipriya Shridhar wrote:
> System workqueues have been able to handle high level of concurrency
> for a long time now and there's no reason to use dedicated workqueues
> just to gain concurrency. Replace dedicated xen_pcibk_wq with the
> use of system_w
On 01/06/16 15:15, Bhaktipriya Shridhar wrote:
> System workqueues have been able to handle high level of concurrency
> for a long time now and there's no reason to use dedicated workqueues
> just to gain concurrency. Replace dedicated xen_pcibk_wq with the
> use of system_wq.
>
> Unlike a dedica
System workqueues have been able to handle high level of concurrency
for a long time now and there's no reason to use dedicated workqueues
just to gain concurrency. Replace dedicated xen_pcibk_wq with the
use of system_wq.
Unlike a dedicated per-cpu workqueue created with create_workqueue(),
syst
