On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 08:12 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 17.09.15 at 18:52, wrote:
> > This essentially reverts c/s 2037f2adb "x86: introduce
> > alloc_vcpu_guest_context()", including the newer arm bits, but achieves
> > the same end goal by using the newer vmalloc() infrastructure.
> >
>>> On 17.09.15 at 18:52, wrote:
> This essentially reverts c/s 2037f2adb "x86: introduce
> alloc_vcpu_guest_context()", including the newer arm bits, but achieves
> the same end goal by using the newer vmalloc() infrastructure.
>
> For both x86 and ARM, {alloc,free}_vcpu_guest_context() become a
Hi Andrew,
On 17/09/15 17:52, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> This essentially reverts c/s 2037f2adb "x86: introduce
> alloc_vcpu_guest_context()", including the newer arm bits, but achieves
> the same end goal by using the newer vmalloc() infrastructure.
>
> For both x86 and ARM, {alloc,free}_vcpu_guest_
This essentially reverts c/s 2037f2adb "x86: introduce
alloc_vcpu_guest_context()", including the newer arm bits, but achieves
the same end goal by using the newer vmalloc() infrastructure.
For both x86 and ARM, {alloc,free}_vcpu_guest_context() become arch-local
static inlines (which avoids a cal
