On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 11:26 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > I'm fully happy with proposed wording (and want the both bits to be used)
Done and committed.
> >
> > > Konrad, this is a bug fix for a particular piece of hardware, it can't
> > > affect anything other than the OMAP ARM platfo
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 05:25:08PM +0200, Oleksandr Dmytryshyn wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 15:51 +0200, Oleksandr Dmytryshyn wrote:
> >> UART is not able to receive bytes when idle mode is not
> >> configured properly. When we use Xen with
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 15:51 +0200, Oleksandr Dmytryshyn wrote:
>> UART is not able to receive bytes when idle mode is not
>> configured properly. When we use Xen with old Linux
>> Kernel (for example 3.8) this kernel configures hwmods
>> for al
On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 15:51 +0200, Oleksandr Dmytryshyn wrote:
> UART is not able to receive bytes when idle mode is not
> configured properly. When we use Xen with old Linux
> Kernel (for example 3.8) this kernel configures hwmods
> for all devices even if the device tree nodes for those
> devices
UART is not able to receive bytes when idle mode is not
configured properly. When we use Xen with old Linux
Kernel (for example 3.8) this kernel configures hwmods
for all devices even if the device tree nodes for those
devices is absent in device tree. Thus UART idle mode
is configured too. The fak
