El 29/04/15 a les 15.44, Andrew Cooper ha escrit:
> On 29/04/15 12:05, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> El 29/04/15 a les 2.38, Andrew Cooper ha escrit:
>>>
+
+if ( is_pvh_domain(d) )
+{
+for ( i = 0; i < 0x1; i++ )
+/* NB: 0xcf8 has special treatme
On 29/04/15 12:05, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
El 29/04/15 a les 2.38, Andrew Cooper ha escrit:
+
+if ( is_pvh_domain(d) )
+{
+for ( i = 0; i < 0x1; i++ )
+/* NB: 0xcf8 has special treatment so we need to trap it. */
Why? (and irrespective of my question, cf8 expec
El 29/04/15 a les 2.38, Andrew Cooper ha escrit:
> On 28/04/15 16:44, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>> Since a PVH hardware domain has access to the physical hardware create a
>> custom more permissive IO bitmap. The permissions set on the bitmap are
>> populated based on the contents of the ioports range
On 28/04/15 16:44, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
Since a PVH hardware domain has access to the physical hardware create a
custom more permissive IO bitmap. The permissions set on the bitmap are
populated based on the contents of the ioports rangeset.
Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné
Cc: Jan Beulich
Cc:
Since a PVH hardware domain has access to the physical hardware create a
custom more permissive IO bitmap. The permissions set on the bitmap are
populated based on the contents of the ioports rangeset.
Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné
Cc: Jan Beulich
Cc: Andrew Cooper
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky
Cc: Sur
