On 12/03/15 13:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Use + on outputs instead of = and a matching input. Allow not just
> memory for the _eflags operand (it turns out that recent gcc produces
> worse code when also doing this for _dst.val, so the latter is being
> avoided).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Revi
At 13:13 + on 12 Mar (1426162439), Jan Beulich wrote:
> Use + on outputs instead of = and a matching input. Allow not just
> memory for the _eflags operand (it turns out that recent gcc produces
> worse code when also doing this for _dst.val, so the latter is being
> avoided).
>
> Signed-off-b
Use + on outputs instead of = and a matching input. Allow not just
memory for the _eflags operand (it turns out that recent gcc produces
worse code when also doing this for _dst.val, so the latter is being
avoided).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
---
v2: Extend simplification in {,i}mul_dbl(), as sug