> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: 19 November 2015 12:55
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: Andrew Cooper; Ian Campbell; Wei Liu; Ian Jackson; Stefano Stabellini;
> xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; Keir (Xen.org)
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/hvm/viridian: flu
>>> On 19.11.15 at 13:33, wrote:
> +case HvFlushVirtualAddressSpace:
> +case HvFlushVirtualAddressList:
> +{
> +cpumask_var_t pcpu_mask;
cpumask_t * (or else ... [skip next comment]
> +struct vcpu *v;
> +
> +struct {
Stray blank line.
> +uint64_t
The Microsoft Hypervisor Top Level Functional Spec. (section 3.4) defines
two bits in CPUID leaf 0x4004:EAX for the hypervisor to recommend
whether or not to issue a hypercall for local or remote TLB flush.
Whilst it's doubtful whether using a hypercall for local TLB flush would
be any more ef
